Skip to content
JOHNSTON | MARTINEAU PLLP
Main Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • Christopher A. Johnston
    • Christopher P. Martineau
  • Truck Accident Legal Services
    • Tractor Trailer Accidents
    • Semi-Truck Accidents
    • Logging Truck Accidents
    • Fuel Truck Accidents
    • Fatal Truck Accidents
    • Commercial Truck Accidents
    • Big Rig Accidents
    • 18-Wheeler Accidents
  • FAQs
  • Blog
  • Locations
    • Minneapolis MN
      • Big Rig Crash lawyer Minneapolis MN
      • 18 Wheeler Accident Lawyer Minneapolis MN
      • Semi Truck Accident Lawyer Minneapolis MN
      • Truck Accident Lawyer Minneapolis MN
      • Truck Collision Lawyer Minneapolis MN
      • Tow Truck Accident Lawyer Minneapolis MN
    • St. Paul MN
      • Truck Accident Lawyer St. Paul MN
    • Rochester MN
      • Truck Accident Lawyer Rochester MN
  • Contact Us
Free Consultations
• Available 24/7 •
(651) 858-3500

Can You Sue Cities For Dangerous Road Conditions

Contact Us

Please complete and submit the contact form below

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Loading

Client Review

Joenie H.

Review stars

Chris Martineau is our lawyer and we have worked together for the past 5 years. From the moment we (my husband and I) started working together, the thing that was apparent and that we respected most about Chris was his honesty and knowledge. He did not mince words or waste time. As time went on, his integrity was clearly transparent as well. We are extremely fortunate to work with Chris.

Practice Areas

  • Truck Accidents
  • Car Accidents
  • Motorcycle Accidents
  • Personal Injury
  • Dept Collection Harrassment
Location vector

We Proudly Serve All of Minnesota • Wisconsin & Iowa

Contact Us

Please complete and submit the contact form below

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Loading

Client Review

Joenie H.

Review stars

Chris Martineau is our lawyer and we have worked together for the past 5 years. From the moment we (my husband and I) started working together, the thing that was apparent and that we respected most about Chris was his honesty and knowledge. He did not mince words or waste time. As time went on, his integrity was clearly transparent as well. We are extremely fortunate to work with Chris.

Practice Areas

  • Truck Accidents
  • Car Accidents
  • Motorcycle Accidents
  • Personal Injury
  • Dept Collection Harrassment
Location vector

We Proudly Serve All of Minnesota • Wisconsin & Iowa

car accident lawyer

You crash because a pothole destroyed your tire, or you're injured when your car hits a washed-out section of road. Perhaps missing traffic signs or faded lane markings contributed to a collision. When dangerous road conditions cause accidents and injuries, the government entity responsible for maintaining those roads can potentially be held liable. However, suing cities, counties, or states for road defects involves special rules, strict notice requirements, and immunity defenses that don't exist in typical personal injury cases.

Our friends at Marsh | Rickard | Bryan, LLC handle road defect claims regularly and understand the procedural hurdles municipalities create. A car accident lawyer experienced with governmental immunity knows that while cities can be sued for dangerous road maintenance failures, these cases require navigating tort claims acts, notice provisions, and immunity defenses that make them significantly more complicated than suing private parties.

Sovereign Immunity Protects Government Entities

Traditional sovereign immunity held that you cannot sue the government without its consent. While modern law has modified this harsh rule, governments still enjoy substantial protections from lawsuits that private defendants don't have.

Each state has passed tort claims acts that waive immunity in certain situations while maintaining it in others. These statutes create the framework for when and how you can sue government entities for dangerous road conditions.

Notice Requirements Are Extremely Strict

The most significant obstacle in road defect cases against cities is the notice requirement. You must file a formal notice of claim with the appropriate government entity within a very short time after your accident.

Common notice deadlines include:

  • 30 days in some jurisdictions
  • 60 to 90 days in others
  • Six months in some states
  • One year in a few jurisdictions

These deadlines are much shorter than standard statutes of limitations for personal injury cases. Missing the notice deadline typically bars your claim permanently, regardless of how obvious the road defect was or how seriously you were injured.

The notice must be filed with the correct department of the correct government entity. Filing with the wrong office can result in denial of your claim.

What The Notice Must Include

Notice of claim forms require specific information about your accident and the road defect:

  • Your name and contact information
  • Date, time, and exact location of the accident
  • Description of the dangerous condition
  • How the condition caused your accident
  • Nature and extent of injuries
  • Amount of damages claimed
  • Description of the government's negligence

Incomplete notices can be rejected, requiring you to refile and potentially missing deadlines.

Prior Notice To The Government Matters

Many tort claims acts require proving the government entity had actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition before your accident. This means the city knew or should have known about the pothole, missing sign, or road defect.

Evidence of prior notice includes:

  • Previous accident reports at the same location
  • Complaints or service requests from residents
  • Inspection records documenting the defect
  • Photographs showing the defect existed long enough for the government to discover it

If the defect was brand new and the government had no reasonable opportunity to discover and repair it, your claim likely fails even if the condition was dangerous.

Reasonable Time To Repair

Even when governments have notice of road defects, they must have reasonable time to make repairs. A pothole that formed yesterday and caused your accident today might not create liability because the city hasn't had time to fix it.

What constitutes reasonable time depends on:

  • Severity of the hazard
  • Available resources
  • Weather conditions affecting repairs
  • Volume of other repair requests

Defects that have existed for weeks or months without repair despite complaints provide stronger liability claims than recent problems.

Design Immunity Vs. Maintenance Failures

Government tort claims acts often distinguish between design decisions and maintenance failures. Design immunity protects discretionary policy decisions about how to build roads, where to place signs, or how to allocate budgets.

However, failing to maintain roads according to their design typically doesn't receive immunity protection. If a road was designed properly but deteriorated through lack of maintenance, the government can be liable.

This distinction can be difficult to apply. Is a missing stop sign a design choice (we decided not to put a sign there) or a maintenance failure (we failed to replace a sign that fell down)? Courts wrestle with these questions in every case.

Common Road Defect Claims

Certain dangerous road conditions commonly form the basis for government liability claims.

Potholes

Large potholes that damage vehicles or cause drivers to lose control create liability when cities have notice and reasonable time to repair them. Size matters. Small surface irregularities don't necessarily create actionable defects.

Missing Or Damaged Signs

Traffic control signs that are missing, knocked down, obscured by vegetation, or faded to illegibility create liability when they contribute to accidents. Stop signs, yield signs, and warning signs about hazards are particularly important.

Inadequate Road Markings

Faded lane lines, missing crosswalks, or absent guidance markings at dangerous intersections can create liability, though governments often argue these are design decisions protected by immunity.

Shoulder Dropoffs

Excessive dropoffs between pavement and road shoulders, particularly on curves, create liability when vehicles run off the road and roll over.

Standing Water And Drainage Problems

Poor drainage that causes standing water, ice formation, or flooding creates liability when governments don't address known drainage defects.

Debris On Roadways

Governments must remove debris, fallen trees, and other hazards from roads within reasonable times after receiving notice or when the hazards should have been discovered through reasonable inspection.

Proving Causation

You must prove the road defect caused your accident. Insurance companies and government attorneys often argue that driver error, not road conditions, caused the crash.

Evidence supporting causation includes:

  • Photographs of the defect
  • Witness testimony about how the defect contributed
  • Accident reconstruction analysis
  • Prior accidents at the same location from the same defect

Damage Caps Often Apply

Many states cap damages in claims against government entities at amounts far below what you could recover from private defendants. Caps of $250,000, $500,000, or $1 million are common.

These caps can severely limit recovery in catastrophic injury cases, leaving victims unable to obtain full compensation even when government negligence is clear.

Which Government Entity Is Responsible

Determining which government entity maintains a particular road is necessary before filing notice. Cities maintain city streets. Counties handle county roads. States own and maintain state highways and interstates.

Filing notice with the wrong entity wastes time and might mean missing deadlines with the correct entity.

Comparative Fault Reduces Recovery

Even when governments are liable for dangerous roads, they'll argue you contributed to the accident through speeding, inattention, or other driver errors. Comparative fault principles reduce your recovery proportionally to your share of responsibility.

Inspection And Warning Duties

Governments must conduct reasonable inspections to discover road defects. Inspection frequency depends on road type, traffic volume, and past problems.

Failure to inspect according to reasonable schedules can constitute negligence even when the government didn't receive specific complaints about a particular defect.

When immediate repair isn't possible, governments must provide adequate warnings through signs, barricades, or other traffic control devices.

Time Limits For Filing Lawsuits

After filing notice and waiting for the government's response (typically 30 to 180 days), you can file a lawsuit if your claim is denied or not resolved. However, overall statutes of limitations still apply.

Some states give you only one year from the accident to file suit against government entities, compared to two or more years for private defendants.

Holding Governments Accountable

Cities and counties can be sued for dangerous road conditions when they have notice of defects and fail to repair them within reasonable times. However, strict notice requirements, immunity defenses, and damage caps make these cases procedurally complex with unique challenges that don't exist in typical injury litigation. We handle road defect claims against government entities and understand the notice requirements, immunity issues, and proof needed to establish governmental liability. If you've been injured due to dangerous road conditions and need to know whether you can hold the responsible government entity accountable, contact our team immediately to discuss notice deadlines and your rights before time runs out.

Blogs

Blogs Page
Loading...
car accident lawyer
December 12, 2025

How Dash Cam Footage Changes Car Accident Cases

The other driver swears they had the green light. Their insurance company backs their version...
Read More
motorcycle accident lawyer
December 8, 2025

How Motorcycle Accident Cases Differ From Car Crashes

A driver turned left directly into your path while you were riding your motorcycle. You...
Read More
truck accident lawyer Minneapolis MN
November 15, 2025

Understanding Comparative Fault In Minnesota Truck Accidents

A major disruption occurred along Interstate 94 near downtown Minneapolis after a semi-truck crashed inside...
Read More
Johnston Martineau

Schedule Your Free
Consultation

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Loading
Johnston Martineau
Connect with Us
  • 1700 West Highway 36 Suite 620
    Roseville, MN 55113

  • Also Serving La Crosse WI and Decorah IA.

  • Phone | (651) 858-3500
  • Toll Free | (877) 791-7790
  • Fax | (612) 379-0480
Navigation
  • Home
  • Attorneys
  • Truck Accidents
  • Services
  • Blog
  • Contact
Practice Areas
Tow Truck Accident Lawyer Minneapolis MN
18-Wheeler Accident Lawyer Minneapolis MN
Truck Accident Lawyer St. Paul MN
Truck Collision Lawyer Minneapolis MN
Semi Truck Accident Lawyer Minneapolis MN
Truck Accident Lawyer Minneapolis MN
Truck Accident Lawyer Rochester MN
Concrete Truck Accident Lawyer Minneapolis MN
Semi Truck Accident Lawyer St. Paul MN
Minnesota 18-Wheeler Accident Lawyer
Minnesota Commercial Truck Accident Lawyer
Minnesota Construction Truck Accident Lawyer
Minnesota Garbage Truck Accident Lawyer
Minnesota Tractor Trailer Accident Lawyer
Minnesota Truck Collision Lawyer
Fuel Truck Accident Lawyer Wisconsin
Concrete Truck Accident Lawyer Wisconsin
Tanker Truck Accident Lawyer Wisconsin
© 2025 Johnston | Martineau PLLP - All Rights Reserved
SEO for Lawyers | Sitemap | Powered by Matador Solutions

Free Consultations • Available 24/7 •

(651) 858-3500

Scroll to Top